You do not even have to assume it - here's a quote that sums up the drift of the entire article: "It is time for national regulatory agencies to guard against unproven applications, especially those targeting children and other vulnerable populations."
The article also makes the claim that some of these technologies are based on simplistic and largely disproved psychological assumptions, but again, its opposition is to their use rather than mere existence.
The article also makes the claim that some of these technologies are based on simplistic and largely disproved psychological assumptions, but again, its opposition is to their use rather than mere existence.