Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If you believe "freedom of choice is a very important thing", you shouldn't have written your comment the way you did -- stripped of all detail and purely negative, as an attempt to make the decision for the readers.

Instead, you should have mentioned the context, and allowed people to come to their own conclusions. Your quote: "Because despite their apparent and commendable work in trying to preserve the privacy of their users, they have regretfully failed to do so in the past, and it will more than likely proceed that way in the future." alongside a bit more detail would have been a fantastic comment, instead of the vague accusatory one-liner you wrote.



Since I don't consider it my job to provide context or be constructive, I let other people like you do it for me. I might follow up on it, as is my freedom of choice, but since I can't guarantee that happening I tend to do things that way. See, isn't that a fun system? I've augmented my own freedom with yours!


I had a glimmer of hope from your previous comment, but you managed to whisk it away immediately. Figures.


No point in placing your hope in people you don't even know. You couldn't figure an eight, with the way you're going.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: